Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 21:23
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 979
94% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,619
100% 1,619 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 866C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 193
Reflection 206
Parallax 215
157% 205 fps
Gravity 190
Splatting 131
138% 160 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 81 76 78 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44% Average
Read 126
Write 102
Mixed 120
SusWrite 78.4
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 25.8
97% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 82
66% 91 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44%
Great: 73%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
76GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 379 105 39 43 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 451
Mixed 348
SusWrite 156
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 56.5
187% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 339
258% 348 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
603GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 153 150 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 151
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
652GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 179 172 171 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 171
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 175
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,073
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback