Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 18:46
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 796
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 73.4
46% 65.1 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 56.1
Splatting 52.1
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 298 297 297 297 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 483
Mixed 390
SusWrite 316
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 62.2
212% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: EXT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 258 259 257 258 258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 264
Mixed 190
SusWrite 258
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 27.2
146% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 80.7
123% 234 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 94%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1071 304 301 304 304 304 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,158
Write 1,498
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 431
282% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 80.2
269% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,489
DQ Mixed 1027
836% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 251%
Great: 235%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1190 303 302 304 304 304 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,770
Write 1,367
Mixed 1046
SusWrite 451
258% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 75.4
259% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 1,503
DQ Mixed 1,021
834% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 233%
Great: 235%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
479GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 99 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 98
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 96.6
73% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB
643GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 127 127 130 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 58.8
Write 91
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 126
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 24.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $786
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback