Adlink KODIAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAdlink KODIAK  (all builds)
MotherboardTo To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3826
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 42.6
1-Core 13.5
2-Core 22.7
20% 26.3 Pts
4-Core 26.3
8-Core 25.7
4% 26 Pts
64-Core 24
2% 24 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M6302 256GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0822A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 189 206 204 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
Read 213
Write 216
Mixed 186
SusWrite 186
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 14.4
44% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 66.2
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 60.6
45% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H-I 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback