| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock B150M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150720 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '20 at 19:08 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.3%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
55% 410 Pts
|
25% 407 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51%
Above average
|
52% 62.3 fps
|
50% 61.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intenso SATAIII 512GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 252 179 4.1 9.7 61 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
76% 342 MB/s
|
47% 11.5 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
89GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 243 230 220 220 215 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
91% 406 MB/s
|
206% 72.5 MB/s
|
244% 327 MB/s
|
|
OOS2000G 2TB
1TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 179 186 184 185 179 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
104% 142 MB/s
|
137% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.6%
Below average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
54% 74.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-HDV Builds (Compare 203 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B150M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 52x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 27x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $283 |