Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 110% UFO	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 163 2-Core 325 106% 194 Pts	4-Core 646 8-Core 1,174 109% 910 Pts	64-Core 1,636 101% 1,636 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Lighting 73 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 91 60% 79 fps	MRender 75.1 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 61.7 56% 70 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 233GB free Firmware: X41000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 201 199 197 195 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 487 Write 468 Mixed 332 SusWrite 231 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 38 133% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 250 209% 304 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 100%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 891GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2472 2322 1656 1659 1655 1654 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	410% Outstanding	Read 2,852 Write 2,533 Mixed 2,238 SusWrite 1903 535% 2,381 MB/s	4K Read 71.6 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 99.8 332% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,822 DQ Write 1,633 DQ Mixed 1,704 1,285% 1,720 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 410% Great: 445%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160 3,427 User benchmarks, average bench 440% 232GB free Firmware: E2010435 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1896 1912 1933 1957 1958 1943 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	501% Outstanding	Read 2,316 Write 1,952 Mixed 2,115 SusWrite 1,933 468% 2,079 MB/s	4K Read 242 4K Write 195 4K Mixed 213 742% 216 MB/s	DQ Read 1,492 DQ Write 1,260 DQ Mixed 1,356 1,022% 1,369 MB/s
Poor: 302% ↑ This bench: 501% Great: 559%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 220GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 415 412 290 289 293 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 414 Write 416 Mixed 392 SusWrite 352 89% 393 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 41.2 139% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 195 144% 189 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 98%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 996 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.91% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 11.6 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 2666 2OZ 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3500, 3500, 3500, 3500 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	104% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 40.6 MC Mixed 32.7 106% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 47.1 SC Mixed 31 94% 33 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,863x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,483x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,392x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	513x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	502x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	443x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	360x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	262x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	223x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	277x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	183x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $901

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16