Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '19 at 07:58
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 95.8 1-Core 159 2-Core 278 100% 178 Pts	4-Core 637 8-Core 1,214 110% 925 Pts	64-Core 1,640 102% 1,640 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 73 Parallax 90.1 59% 78.6 fps	MRender 75.1 Gravity 73 Splatting 61.3 56% 69.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 233GB free Firmware: X41000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 208 198 199 200 199 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 471 Mixed 348 SusWrite 237 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 39.3 139% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 253 208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 100%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 13,939 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 2301 890 614 614 614 613 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	325% Outstanding	Read 3,413 Write 2,300 Mixed 848 SusWrite 941 414% 1,875 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 62.7 243% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,197 DQ Write 1,367 DQ Mixed 945 805% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 325% Great: 313%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160 3,427 User benchmarks, average bench 440% 234GB free Firmware: 0325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 1727 1726 1741 1736 1738 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	523% Outstanding	Read 2,321 Write 1,957 Mixed 2,115 SusWrite 1,727 456% 2,030 MB/s	4K Read 262 4K Write 228 4K Mixed 240 826% 243 MB/s	DQ Read 1,652 DQ Write 1,430 DQ Mixed 1,510 1,140% 1,530 MB/s
Poor: 302% ↑ This bench: 523% Great: 559%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 215GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 415 411 290 290 290 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Read 414 Write 415 Mixed 392 SusWrite 352 89% 393 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 41.7 140% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 197 145% 191 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 98%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 996 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 14 14 14 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Read 18 Write 11.3 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 13.1 15% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 2666 2OZ 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3400, 3400, 3400, 3400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	106% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 41.4 MC Mixed 32.2 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 47.7 SC Mixed 32.5 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 54.7 73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,853x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,479x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,387x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	512x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	499x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	356x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	222x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	276x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $787

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16