HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 00:30
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 287
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 998
94% 780 Pts
64-Core 1012
63% 1012 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.42
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 47.6
47% 53 fps
MRender 45.1
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 48.7
40% 48 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 731 895 279 161 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,134
Write 903
Mixed 797
SusWrite 410
181% 811 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 33.7
110% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 753
DQ Mixed 221
260% 434 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 129%
Great: 203%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 343 421 404 404 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 382
Write 379
Mixed 308
SusWrite 357
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 18.9
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 154
139% 209 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 170 179 180 179 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 167
Mixed 100
SusWrite 160
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 101%
Ambarell A9 DSC EVK Platf 128GB
24GB free, PID 4026
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 11 12 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 7.8
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 12.8
17% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 28.6
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback