Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 11:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 187
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 600
58% 477 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 0.06
6% 26.7 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 6.73
Splatting 14.3
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 110 17 11 182 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 376
Write 265
Mixed 278
SusWrite 62
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 10.3
44% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 41.8
46% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 52%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
468GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 104 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 103
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 103
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
164% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback