Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 208
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 589
57% 471 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 7.88
6% 29.4 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 15.7
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 1.9 47 9.6 114 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 403
Write 214
Mixed 234
SusWrite 60.4
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 10.5
42% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 80.9
DQ Write 67
DQ Mixed 32.5
36% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 52%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
662GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 70 79 72 88 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 52.7
Write 84.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 80.3
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback