Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 146% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 167% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 73.9 1-Core 153 2-Core 304 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1,122 103% 860 Pts	64-Core 2131 132% 2131 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3715) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.8 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	159% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 228 Parallax 242 180% 230 fps	MRender 257 Gravity 218 Splatting 136 160% 204 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 391 238 211 118 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 445 Mixed 442 SusWrite 251 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 54 178% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 133%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164 35,257 User benchmarks, average bench 314% 70GB free Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 911 Write 3,170 Mixed 924 380% 1,668 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 54.3 207% 79.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,486 DQ Write 905 DQ Mixed 753 680% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 275 280 276 276 280 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 445 Mixed 356 SusWrite 296 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 50.3 172% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 154 128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 35GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 286 292 289 289 290 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 400 Mixed 401 SusWrite 307 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 48 166% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 139 105% 142 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 93GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 126 125 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 96 Write 106 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 124 70% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 75%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 283GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 167 167 167 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	72% Very good	Read 82.5 Write 86.8 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 167 66% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.9 353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 880 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 325GB free, PID a100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 85 82 83 84 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 76.8 Write 82.5 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 83.3 89% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB 16,566 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 35 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 30.4 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 26.4 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	354x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	325x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	284x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	154x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	129x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	113x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	162x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	142x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	95x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	76x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $899

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16