Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 192
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 700
63% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,778
110% 1,778 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 148
Parallax 137
99% 136 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 135
Splatting 107
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,092
Write 2,562
Mixed 2,617
614% 2,757 MB/s
4K Read 112
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 77.9
317% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 397
297% 397 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
160GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 344 295 294 293 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,521
Write 1,285
Mixed 578
SusWrite 465
214% 962 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 35.3
124% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 361
266% 352 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 143%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
227GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 202 203 203 203 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 345
Write 374
Mixed 337
SusWrite 201
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 35.5
116% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 231
174% 235 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 203 205 205 205 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 351
Write 375
Mixed 333
SusWrite 202
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 35.5
115% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 230
175% 239 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
723GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 114 115 115 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 101
Write 113
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 112
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
266GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 75.7
Write 41.3
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 71
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 31.1
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback