Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 172
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 697
63% 528 Pts
64-Core 1,778
110% 1,778 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 146
Parallax 123
110% 135 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 137
Splatting 109
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 314 311 302 303 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 413
Mixed 403
SusWrite 307
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 42.2
139% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
261% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94%
Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
83GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 288 287 290 291 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,381
Mixed 507
SusWrite 464
215% 969 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 36.5
130% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 336
248% 321 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 143%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
231GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 240
Write 225
Mixed 227
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 171
128% 168 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
219GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 292 292 292 291 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 416
Mixed 379
SusWrite 306
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 41.4
136% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 165
174% 286 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
723GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 114 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 113
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
269GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 41.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 69.5
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 32.1
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback