Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 11:56
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 171
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 672
62% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,787
111% 1,787 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 144
Parallax 124
109% 134 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 137
Splatting 111
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 297 271 304 289 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 403
Write 429
Mixed 352
SusWrite 290
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 29.2
90% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 144
156% 262 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
83GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,604
Write 1,471
Mixed 567
268% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 35.2
130% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 401
285% 361 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
231GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 235
Write 231
Mixed 213
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 33.6
109% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 194
143% 188 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
219GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 291 292 290 290 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 348
Mixed 384
SusWrite 309
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 40.9
134% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 251
192% 256 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
723GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 114 113 114 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 112
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
269GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 35.6
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 65.7
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 31.6
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback