Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 147% UFO	Desktop 111% UFO	Workstation 152% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '20 at 15:03
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$284 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Memory 98.7 1-Core 162 2-Core 326 106% 195 Pts	4-Core 640 8-Core 1251 112% 945 Pts	64-Core 1,778 110% 1,778 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% EVGA(3842 3183) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4410 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	133% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 172 Parallax 185 148% 180 fps	MRender 226 Gravity 158 Splatting 110 128% 164 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 807 803 801 809 809 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	321% Outstanding	Read 2,662 Write 2,450 Mixed 1,867 SusWrite 1,052 449% 2,008 MB/s	4K Read 68 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 90.5 300% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,382 DQ Write 1,162 DQ Mixed 1,257 946% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 321% Great: 340%
WDC WD6003FFBX-68MU3N0 6TB 482 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1TB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 159 160 162 159 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 162 Write 170 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 160 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 1.2 9% 4.4 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 4.7 DQ Mixed 4.4 3% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 29%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 48GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 493 493 492 290 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 492 Mixed 415 SusWrite 390 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 68.9 237% 86.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 355 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 323GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 80 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 121 Write 110 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 79.2 70% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 100%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB 7,216 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 317GB free Firmware: DN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 119 121 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 175 Write 168 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 120 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 250% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 126%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129 374 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 643GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 140 136 139 140 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
ASMT 2115 2TB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 77GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 168 170 168 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 206 Write 158 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 169 200% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.5 237% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 111%
ASMT 2115 2TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 251GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 37.3 Write 36.5 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 37.7 49% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 26.5 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 40.5 SC Mixed 31.6 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 42.4 94% 42.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,633x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,492x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,148x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	686x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	581x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	484x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	589x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	419x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	386x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	317x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	287x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	250x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $778

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16