Asus GL753VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL753VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL753VD
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 07:19
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 193
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 557
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1590) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 6.41
6% 12.7 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 13.5
8% 9.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256S1G 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 236 329 322 349 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 454
Write 383
Mixed 312
SusWrite 321
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 35.9
121% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 193
167% 245 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
129GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 82 85 80 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 46.8
Write 87
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 82.5
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
156% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 71%
USB_DRIVE 2GB
1GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.6% Terrible
Read 20
Write 4
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.5
9% 8.32 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.6
10% 8.85 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL753VD Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL753VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback