Intel HURONRIVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIntel X300
MotherboardIntel HURONRIVER  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 08:36
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2467M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 93.4
51% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1B50 5611) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 246 236 238 255 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 442
Write 429
Mixed 325
SusWrite 265
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 31.2
107% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 190
160% 231 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 118%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.6
7% 7.05 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMB40056SOX8291333 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HURONRIVER Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel HURONRIVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback