To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190706
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '20 at 02:08
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 63.1 37% 54 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 218 20% 169 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370 1,494 User benchmarks, average bench 21% XFX(1682 2016) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 27.5 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 34 22% 31.1 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 24.3 Splatting 37.7 26% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 110 121 137 118 112 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 231 Write 214 Mixed 198 SusWrite 129 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 8.9 40% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 87.2 DQ Mixed 18 36% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 55%
Asgard AN256NVMe-M.2/80 256GB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 238GB free Firmware: S0318A0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1037 1071 1068 129 108 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1,265 Write 1,063 Mixed 841 SusWrite 587 210% 939 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 19.2 85% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 229 167% 218 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 197%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 565GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 156 153 163 164 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 150 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 157 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 107%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 800GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 137 138 137 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 141 Write 142 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 138 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 85%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 584GB free Firmware: 2AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 88 89 89 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 82.8 Write 19 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 86 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 15.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	713x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	279x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16