Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '20 at 07:32
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 240 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 712 72% 582 Pts	64-Core 722 45% 722 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Lighting 74 Reflection 75.7 Parallax 66.2 60% 72 fps	MRender 72.7 Gravity 70 Splatting 69.4 58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Richdisk device 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9,117 Write 7,771 Mixed 8,104 1,857% 8,331 MB/s	4K Read 540 4K Write 498 4K Mixed 512 1,737% 516 MB/s	DQ Read 1,715 DQ Write 1,709 DQ Mixed 1,752 1,305% 1,725 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 31%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 29GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 7.2 91 434 447 419 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.7% Poor	Read 7.3 Write 4.3 Mixed 6 SusWrite 249 15% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 11.4 17% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 92%
Richvdsk device 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 295GB free Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 30 34 32 31 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 68.3 Write 74 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 32.6 13% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 12.4 33% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 6.7 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 13.5 9% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 24%
Richvdsk device 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 293GB free Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 30 34 32 31 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.2% Very poor	Read 52.5 Write 74 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 32.6 12% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 12.4 40% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 13.4 10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB 680 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H310M-V3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H310M-V3 R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	119x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	68x
Core i5-9400Intel $160Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	27x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	26x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	22x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 14,529 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369