HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 01:22
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 164
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 462
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1819 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 38.1
24% 33.7 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 31
Splatting 36
27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 25%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate SSD 500GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 183 159 263 270 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 367
Write 354
Mixed 314
SusWrite 228
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 37.8
132% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 169
142% 208 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate SSD 500GB
269GB free
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 253 452 456 456 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 443
Mixed 404
SusWrite 421
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 34.2
117% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 222
203% 309 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 97 118 101 94 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 66.2
Write 106
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 106
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 104 103 104 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 130
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 106
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 67%
General UDisk 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 14
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 14
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 9%
General UDisk 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 12 15 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Read 15
Write 6.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 12.9
11% 9.23 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 029E CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback