HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 21:14
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 395
48% 368 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1819 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 38.1
25% 33.8 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 35.8
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 25%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate SSD 500GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 172 314 315 318 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 346
Write 338
Mixed 314
SusWrite 277
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 36.1
132% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 163
140% 206 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate SSD 500GB
269GB free
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 296 458 459 459 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 460
Mixed 411
SusWrite 427
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 41.1
145% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 221
204% 312 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 32 34 30 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 127
Write 50.6
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 34.8
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 123 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 87.4
Write 109
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 124
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
139% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 67%
General UDisk 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 12 15 13 15 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 6.8
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 12.9
10% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 029E CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback