Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 169 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 422 47% 370 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 34.9 32% 34.3 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 33.5 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 304 310 302 308 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 423 Mixed 370 SusWrite 313 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 36.4 134% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 322 246% 334 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 122%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 820GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 26 32 49 51 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 90.2 Write 104 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 52.6 48% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 37% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFD824A.C16FADP Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 19.1 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,352x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	789x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	781x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	274x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	159x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	310x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16