Acer Aspire SW5-011

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire SW5-011  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Fendi
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140612
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 11:33
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3745
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 35.3
26% 35.4 Pts
4-Core 69.7
8-Core 69.1
9% 69.4 Pts
64-Core 69.7
4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0900) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.91
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4e 31GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WDC WD50 00MPCK-21AWHT0 500GB
396GB free, PID 0735
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 32.8
Mixed 24.8
38% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.26
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback