Asus H97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 331
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Sapphire(174B E306) 2GB
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 40.1
27% 36.1 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 26.4
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$49
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 4.6 54 1.5 73 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 402
Write 227
Mixed 182
SusWrite 72.4
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 15.9
64% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 50.8
DQ Write 24
DQ Mixed 38.5
28% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 55%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
84GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 95 91 98 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 244
Write 119
Mixed 142
SusWrite 95
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 29.3
113% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.6
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 92
73% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-053.A00LF 99U5471-066.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO GAMER - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback