Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime20.8 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 22:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 161
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 314
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 85.3
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 79.1
70% 82.4 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 65.9
66% 83.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 436
Mixed 299
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 42
140% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 46.5
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 57.6
53% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
145GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 77 77 114 114 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 415
Write 103
Mixed 342
SusWrite 148
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 28.8
104% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 41.9
41% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 101%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
17GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 52
Mixed 40
SusWrite 50.9
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-053.A00LF 99U5471-066.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 31.5" 1920 1017 ACR0AFA ED320QR S3
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback