Asus Z87-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140603
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 00:39
Run Duration652 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 235
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 649
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 61.2
52% 64.3 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 55.7
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST3500413AS 750GB
29GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 488
Mixed 483
109% 487 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 37.8
144% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 74.2
126% 244 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 506
Write 345
Mixed 344
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 25.5
137% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 70
74% 117 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 183
Mixed 144
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.38
114% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 154
Write 134
Mixed 113
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.47
118% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
457GB free
Firmware: JC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 105
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.63
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 70%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
118GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 24.4
Mixed 22.6
33% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.54
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.86
84% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15%
Great: 37%
USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 5598
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 5.04
Mixed 11
16% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.08
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 1.03
108% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 15%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB
6GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 18
Write 3.21
Mixed 5.81
9% 9.02 MB/s
4K Read 6.39
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 1.65
153% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-DELUXE Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-DELUXE - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback