Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 17:02
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 506
68% 505 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 64.1
56% 67.9 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 59.3
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,005
Write 7,216
Mixed 7,308
1,676% 7,510 MB/s
4K Read 571
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 328
1,423% 386 MB/s
DQ Read 1,580
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 1,349
1,027% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 291 296 295 296 296 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 439
Mixed 399
SusWrite 301
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 49.8
172% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 131 132 133 133 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 73.7
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 130
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 84%
WD WD20EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 129 132 133 133 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 80.7
Write 65
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 130
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $864
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback