Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 15:48
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 503
67% 502 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 70.5
56% 70.1 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 64
Splatting 55.7
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,150
Write 7,220
Mixed 7,437
1,696% 7,602 MB/s
4K Read 583
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 336
1,447% 389 MB/s
DQ Read 1,600
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1,319
1,017% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 289 295 296 297 296 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 444
Mixed 364
SusWrite 304
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 46.3
166% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 131 134 134 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 120
Write 94.5
Mixed 75
SusWrite 130
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 84%
WD WD20EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 130 131 133 131 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 91
Write 60
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 129
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 21.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $876
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback