Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer B85H3-M4
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 14:21
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 96
2-Core 167
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 333
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD8730
PowerColor(148C 8730) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 8.23
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 10.6
7% 10 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 8.13
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 302 11 9.4 5.4 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 465
Write 400
Mixed 375
SusWrite 117
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 29.6
112% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 46.7
80% 151 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
88GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 136 140 151 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 89
SusWrite 140
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
65GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 73
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 46.5
50% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 59%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 2TB
57GB free, PID 0227
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 117 109 118 96 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 99.5
Write 104
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 114
130% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB
125GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25
Mixed 20
SusWrite 25.9
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 18.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback