Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer B85H3-M4
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 01:04
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 201
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 376
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD8730
PowerColor(148C 8730) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11
7% 10 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 8.13
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 11 11 11 12 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 373
Write 360
Mixed 356
SusWrite 70.1
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 26.8
123% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 50.2
80% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
91GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 135 148 167 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 144
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
98GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 81
Mixed 73.5
60% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
7GB free, PID 05b8
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.8 7.6 7.4 6.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 117
Write 4.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 7
25% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
67% 6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 2TB
94GB free, PID 0227
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 24
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 26.2
35% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB
313GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 26.4
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback