Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer B85H3-M4
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 115
60% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 356
50% 368 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD8730
PowerColor(148C 8730) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.27
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 11.2
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 12.4
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 177 183 52 8.7 9 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 57
Write 175
Mixed 81
SusWrite 97.1
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 18.1
83% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.1
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 42.3
44% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 102%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
7GB free, PID 05b8
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 8 7.2 7.6 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 128
Write 39
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.4
43% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
59% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 23%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-00HXZT1 500GB
466GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 23.3
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 24
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback