Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 05:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 393
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.5% Good
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 70.2
70% 77.9 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 70.8
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 367 58 50 52 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 435
Write 376
Mixed 363
SusWrite 143
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 28.7
141% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 49.2
96% 190 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
531GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 75 82 72 81 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 30.7
Write 80
Mixed 40
SusWrite 79.8
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 113%
WDC WD10JPVX-00J 1TB
157GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 13 13 13 16 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 13.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 14.2
17% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.C1GMM.DFW0C Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback