ECS A785GM-AD3

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	ECS A785GM-AD3 (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '20 at 16:47
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 81 1-Core 43 2-Core 87.1 47% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 173 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 53.5 35% 45.5 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 52.3 Splatting 38.3 39% 48.9 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 89 64 48 55 61 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.4% Below average	Read 173 Write 94.8 Mixed 120 SusWrite 65.3 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 16.9 70% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 42.1 DQ Mixed 24.6 21% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 85%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 7GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 125 128 125 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 136 Write 37 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 125 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 20GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 91 65 48 57 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 70 Write 26 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 66.4 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 77%
WDC WD50 00LPVX-22V0TT0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 466GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.6% Very poor	Read 33 Write 27.3 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 14.9 33% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 25%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 446GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 24 Write 23.2 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 23.1 31% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 40GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 23.5 Write 22.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 8.3 24% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 24%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 23 Write 15.7 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 8.2 22% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 245GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 24.2 Mixed 18 SusWrite 8.3 24% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 19%
ST2000LM 007-1R8174 2TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 988GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 21 Write 22.7 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 8.2 24% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 27%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 332GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 29 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 27.8 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 27.9 36% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 17%
Generic External 500GB 1,039 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 464GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 27 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 14.9 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00 Kingston 99U5595-001.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 12GB 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.9% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A785GM-AD3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A785GM-AD3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x
9905402-669.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 36%, 23 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 3x4GBMicronBench 42%, 163 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16