Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-HD3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160303
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 02 '20 at 00:57
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 368
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.9
32% 36.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 36.4
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 697 536 534 533 535 548 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 718
Write 1,097
Mixed 793
SusWrite 564
180% 793 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.4
222% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 559
513% 793 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 173%
Great: 291%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
11GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 436
Mixed 384
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 46.2
153% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 240
201% 289 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
177GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 166 105 91 89 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 468
Write 415
Mixed 330
SusWrite 133
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 41.8
144% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 180
166% 255 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
148GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 69
SusWrite 97
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
73GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 51 51 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 75
Write 69.7
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 51.1
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 69%
WDC WD25 00BEKT-60PVMT0 250GB
19GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 37.1
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-HD3 Builds (Compare 2,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback