Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 01:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 128
59% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 563
41% 372 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 49.2
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 44.6
40% 52.8 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 54.5
34% 39.3 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 710 364 371 412 431 395 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,541
Write 1,845
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 447
287% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 66.2
221% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 626
449% 574 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 182%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 25.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback