| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Razer DA530 |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190516 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 11 '19 at 14:29 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 55% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
77.1%
Very good
|
70% 115 Pts
|
63% 499 Pts
|
43% 694 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23%
Poor
|
16% 29.2 fps
|
36% 41.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
61.7%
Good
|
61% 21.5 GB/s
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
47% 85.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,028 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 445x |
| GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples | 275x |
| RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples | 275x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |