Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 195 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 384 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	29.5% Poor	Lighting 34.5 Reflection 32.9 Parallax 41.6 28% 36.3 fps	MRender 46 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 33.2 32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 31%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 1.44 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 300 276 281 280 282 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 465 Mixed 376 SusWrite 272 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 42.5 138% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 369 277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 191GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 247 231 225 224 222 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 466 Mixed 318 SusWrite 228 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 42.1 140% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 337 263% 361 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 114%
Ext Hard Disk 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 325GB free, PID 000a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 27 28 27 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 21.5 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 26.3 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566