Medion ERAZER X15803 MD61414

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMedion ERAZER X15803 MD61414  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION GK5Cx
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '19 at 06:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 240
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 787
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1E39 A00C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 7.56
6% 37.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 14.3
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,230
Write 1,478
Mixed 1184
360% 1,631 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 69.9
235% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,008
750% 989 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
371GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 88 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 72.7
Write 56.8
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 87.8
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
173% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
F301 G2RT-4AFT00 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ERAZER X15803 MD61414 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion ERAZER X15803 MD61414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback