Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 20:33
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 135
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 429
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.4
19% 20.3 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 16.6
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-128G-1006 128GB
174GB free
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 175 173 173 168 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 453
Write 323
Mixed 214
SusWrite 171
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 35.5
123% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 192
149% 205 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 40 40 39 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 111
Write 38.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 38.9
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58
271GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 35.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 35.2
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58
193GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 44 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 118
Write 39.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 43.3
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
93GB free, PID ab2e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 78 79 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 101
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 78.6
107% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20
15GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 32.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 29
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
68% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback