bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH55HC
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 15:29
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 308
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 65.1
59% 71.1 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 72.2
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 198 167 177 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 237
Write 222
Mixed 180
SusWrite 192
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 23
70% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 154
115% 154 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 133%
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
169GB free
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 219 218 223 152 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.1% Above average
Read 237
Write 169
Mixed 204
SusWrite 199
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 25.1
82% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 168
129% 174 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
443GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 66
SusWrite 99.3
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.8 7.8 7.9 7.4 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Read 8
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 7.5
9% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF M378B5273CH0-CH9 9905471-006.A00LF M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback