Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H170M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 11:34
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 209
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 647
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Nvidia(10DE 13A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 163
Parallax 174
140% 170 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 145
Splatting 105
115% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
67GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 339 329 322 317 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 414
Mixed 242
SusWrite 335
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 34
129% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 161
170% 282 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 1024 1014 996 1004 994 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,149
Write 1,990
Mixed 1,509
SusWrite 1,038
374% 1,672 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 73.1
245% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 742
537% 702 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 256%
Great: 372%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
178GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 93 98 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 94.3
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
176GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 135 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 120
Write 97.5
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 133
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 108 113 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45% Average
Read 48.5
Write 106
Mixed 68
SusWrite 107
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45%
Great: 90%
ST1000DL 002-9TT153 1TB
484GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 35 35 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 34.2
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 35.3
43% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback