Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2124G 422 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 474 68% 499 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620 6,548 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 19.6 19% 21.9 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 21.2 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB 10,890 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0L2QEXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 266 268 269 265 261 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 2,185 Write 1,320 Mixed 1,051 SusWrite 285 267% 1,210 MB/s	4K Read 54.8 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 72.5 243% 84.6 MB/s	DQ Read 981 DQ Write 1,392 DQ Mixed 998 807% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU7CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (97^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16