Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte B250M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 419
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 38
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 36.1
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GIGABYTE 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 93 120 57 77 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 336
Mixed 363
SusWrite 114
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 39
174% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 201
180% 271 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 91%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
69GB free
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 58
Mixed 42
SusWrite 57.6
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 3d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 9.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 9.6
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
31% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 8%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 115 114 115 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 16.5
Write 67.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 114
97% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
181% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback