Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3V-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B250M-D3V
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3V-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170425
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '19 at 14:21
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$123 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 444 59% 443 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 94.4 Parallax 88.4 83% 94.7 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 88.9 Splatting 78 74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB 2,741 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 282 282 274 268 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 451 Write 448 Mixed 382 SusWrite 283 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 35.8 124% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 106 80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 126%
Toshiba THNSN8960PCSE 960GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 349GB free Firmware: 8EET SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 391 392 410 417 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 279 Write 426 Mixed 365 SusWrite 392 83% 365 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 33 110% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 110 83% 111 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 185GB free Firmware: 1AQ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 74 75 74 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 132 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 74.9 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00ZAT0 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 72GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 28.3 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 34.5 40% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00A0RT0 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 11GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 18.5 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 17.1 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 32%
WDC WD10 JFCX-68N6GN0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 131GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 33.8 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 36 46% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MK8032GAX 80GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 66GB free, PID 2507 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 18 18 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 25 Write 19 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 17.4 26% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 20.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B250M-D3V-CF Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3V-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $86Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	14x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	12x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	11x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	6x

SSD
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
Vertex 4 128GBOCZ $215Bench 88%, 19,372 samples	3x

RAM
9905678-023.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 2,792 samples	5x
9905625-075.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 43%, 457 samples	4x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16