Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '19 at 07:08
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 75 1-Core 153 2-Core 303 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 891 93% 746 Pts	64-Core 883 55% 883 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2507 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.4% Excellent	Lighting 117 Reflection 122 Parallax 133 95% 124 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 108 75% 90.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 120GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 110GB free Firmware: 526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 163 149 155 155 154 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 319 Write 193 Mixed 218 SusWrite 159 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 7.4 25% 7.63 MB/s	DQ Read 70.8 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 80.7 71% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 59%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1560 922 935 940 948 934 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 1,649 Write 2,576 Mixed 1,687 SusWrite 1,040 393% 1,738 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 195 4K Mixed 84.3 289% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,158 DQ Write 908 DQ Mixed 1,063 787% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 298%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 355GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 329 319 319 320 319 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 461 Write 405 Mixed 414 SusWrite 328 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 33.4 109% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 87.5 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 110 91% 127 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 98%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 443GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 187 229 289 208 335 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 175 Write 88.2 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 259 34% 149 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 7.9 32% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 8.3 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 10.2 8% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 69%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 111GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 316 317 317 317 317 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 451 Write 400 Mixed 352 SusWrite 324 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 33.2 116% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 92.4 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 107 90% 128 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 181 185 184 184 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 162 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 180 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 61.5 Mixed 29.6 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.8 232% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.1% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 29 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 26.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	876x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	840x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	277x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16