Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '19 at 00:26
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 74.9 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 94% 176 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 882 92% 738 Pts	64-Core 884 55% 884 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 145 Parallax 122 104% 131 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 124 Splatting 105 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2143 940 945 948 953 944 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,541 Write 2,118 Mixed 1,641 SusWrite 1,146 364% 1,611 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 69.8 227% 82.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,059 DQ Write 779 DQ Mixed 942 698% 927 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 298%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 355GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 322 318 319 319 319 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 399 Write 398 Mixed 364 SusWrite 331 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 26.3 75% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 87.4 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 107 90% 126 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 98%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 443GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 180 188 197 197 197 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.8% Average	Read 204 Write 213 Mixed 187 SusWrite 213 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 15.9 54% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 52.9 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 49.4 54% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 69%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 112GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 316 317 317 317 318 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 443 Write 377 Mixed 337 SusWrite 327 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 30.3 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.6 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 110 92% 128 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 101%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 110GB free Firmware: 526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 181 183 170 167 164 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	141% Outstanding	Read 316 Write 188 Mixed 218 SusWrite 172 166% 224 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 7.2 1,237% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 140%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 184 183 181 184 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 137 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 181 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 154 151 154 154 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 48.9 Write 131 Mixed 33.4 SusWrite 142 64% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.9 244% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.1% Very good	MC Read 32 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 29 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 27.1 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	876x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	840x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	277x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16