Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive374% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 15:28
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 330
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1285
115% 974 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 867E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2355 MHz, MLim: 3665 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 7.56
5% 6.88 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 140
Splatting 22.3
46% 59.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
679GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2357 2185 1422 1555 1547 1541 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 2,678
Write 2391
Mixed 1,926
SusWrite 1,768
492% 2,191 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 89.3
294% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,637
DQ Write 1,379
DQ Mixed 1,487
1,120% 1,501 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 374%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
104GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 307 304 300 302 303 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 463
Mixed 412
SusWrite 319
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 67.6
237% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 129%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
344GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 66 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 82.3
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 67.9
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 192 197 195 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 190
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 195
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
591GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 102 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 114
Write 100
Mixed 107
SusWrite 102
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 36.5
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 33.1
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback