Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 14:23
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 165
2-Core 331
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1,320
117% 991 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 867E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 124
Parallax 140
104% 131 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 122
Splatting 99.6
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
679GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1928 1774 1575 1569 1563 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 2,481
Mixed 1,990
SusWrite 1,701
496% 2,209 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 90.9
301% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,712
DQ Write 1,475
DQ Mixed 1,573
1,185% 1587 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 375%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
104GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 309 306 301 304 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 494
Mixed 417
SusWrite 321
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 68.9
242% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 131%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
344GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 81
Write 44.8
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 82.1
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 199 196 195 194 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 197
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 194
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
591GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 113
Write 101
Mixed 106
SusWrite 65
72% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 36.4
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 33.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback