Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 16:45
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 897
82% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,290
80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 63.6
54% 67.6 fps
MRender 75.4
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 59.7
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1416 1853 1845 1821 1773 1861 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2058
Write 1,864
Mixed 944
SusWrite 1,761
372% 1,657 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 60.5
202% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 776
572% 759 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 286%
Great: 363%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
230GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 278 277 277 277 277 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 474
Mixed 426
SusWrite 284
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 46.1
164% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 237
215% 328 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
238GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 451 431 434 423 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 370
Mixed 346
SusWrite 438
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 41.1
146% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 152
166% 281 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
237GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 482 478 481 468 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 441
Mixed 372
SusWrite 477
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 42.1
147% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 179
179% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 167 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 167
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.8
338% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 33
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 26.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback