Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '19 at 22:35
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	77%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 120 52% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 235 26% 206 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.9% Good	Lighting 82.1 Reflection 94.1 Parallax 76.1 67% 84.1 fps	MRender 81.7 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 68.4 58% 71.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS960GD0MEE-5410A 960GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 806GB free (System drive) Firmware: 40032A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 441 398 237 240 240 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 726 Write 542 Mixed 538 SusWrite 331 119% 534 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 29.1 95% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 671 DQ Write 544 DQ Mixed 564 434% 593 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 177%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 206GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 180 180 167 148 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 353 Write 196 Mixed 236 SusWrite 164 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 29.1 101% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 148 137% 212 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 91%
Adata SX6000LNP 512GB 11,097 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 476GB free Firmware: V9001c00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 495 586 621 636 655 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,532 Write 751 Mixed 653 SusWrite 576 194% 878 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 33.7 123% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 599 DQ Mixed 385 301% 402 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 259%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 19,561 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 93GB free Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 380 406 441 417 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 832 Write 740 Mixed 713 SusWrite 381 149% 667 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 38.9 124% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 834 DQ Write 561 DQ Mixed 658 502% 684 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 170%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 607GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 110 113 115 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 94.4 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 113 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 197% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 71%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB 4,004 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 312GB free Firmware: 2BE10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 84 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 73 Write 54 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 83.4 49% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 67%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 319GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 29 19 39 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 40 Write 40.2 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 34.3 53% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 11.2 830% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.7 1,084% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2856, 2856, 2856, 2856 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 23.9 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 17.3 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,161x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	179x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	341x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	92x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	62x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	81x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	56x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16