Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 19:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,011
97% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,622
100% 1,622 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 95.6
Parallax 194
94% 135 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 107
Splatting 132
94% 112 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 480 480 488 474 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 482
Mixed 420
SusWrite 481
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 47.1
162% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 163 163 155 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 116
Write 138
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 162
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
ST6000AS 0002-1N917X 6TB
985GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 118 118 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.6% Very good
Read 87.5
Write 133
Mixed 85
SusWrite 117
149% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 0.7
417% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
430% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 118 118 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 155
Write 152
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 117
150% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 28.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 30
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $900
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback